🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing harmful online content contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is largely happening at the regional government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various individuals to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional countries are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies take a more measured position. Unicef has warned that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve safety.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.